- Edited
I got the picture above from https://openlitespeed.org/
Is it true? Does anyone make compare between Open Litespeed and WordOps Fastcgi cache yet?
Thanks
I got the picture above from https://openlitespeed.org/
Is it true? Does anyone make compare between Open Litespeed and WordOps Fastcgi cache yet?
Thanks
Bear in mind that is requests per second it can handle, not page delivery speed
I used the Litespeed server with their Litespeed cache before. And for me, Wordops + Redis is much faster than the Litespeed based WordPress blog. All of it on the same VPS. I tried to like it, but in the end, it didn't work for me.
Kogorashi I used the Litespeed server with their Litespeed cache before. And for me, Wordops + Redis is much faster than the Litespeed based WordPress blog.
I have the very same opinion. I tried both and nothing beats WordOps (for my needs and taste).
I did several tests with openlitespeed and litespeed.
WordOps remains the best choice.
Litespeed worked wildly better for me recently.. I just wish it didnt come with so much bloat.
No doubt OpenLiteSpeed is a good out of the box. I used CyberPanel on many site and even I did setup for my many clients.
I also setup WordOps and Cloudpanel for my many clients but found that CyberPanel based on OpenLiteSpeed is a good choice for small websites.
OpenLiteSpeed can handle more traffic with less traffic where WordOps consume more traffic.
If you have a big website with a lot of traffic. LiteSpeed is the choice.
I used WordOps, Cloudpanel, Hestiacp etc. But Litespeed can hand more requests. With Nginx the VPS is down but with LiteSpeed it's still available to serve clients.
Lscache also give a better grade when you test your site on https://pagespeed.web.dev/
If you still want to use Nginx, try HestiaCP or CloudPanel instead of WordOps (better support, more developers, faster update and faster new version release).
Hosted by VirtuBox